Descriptive Evidence from Audit Practice on SAS No. 99 Brainstorming Activities
Jodi L. Bellovary is a Ph.D. Candidate and Karla M. Johnstone is an Associate Professor, both at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.
SUMMARY: This paper describes how auditors conduct brainstorming sessions to comply with the requirements of SAS No. 99. We gather evidence by interviewing 22 auditors at all personnel levels across seven audit firms (including all of the Big 4 firms) and by observing actual brainstorming sessions. The results reveal how auditors prepare for brainstorming sessions and allow us to describe a typical four-step brainstorming session process. We describe brainstorming group interactions and provide evidence on brainstorming session outcomes in terms of fraud risk assessments, audit plan modifications, and budget modifications. Finally, we report how audit firms encourage professional skepticism during brainstorming.
Received: April 2007; Accepted: July 2007; Published Online: October 1, 2007
Cited by
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2012.
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (524 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Nov-2011.
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (400 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011.
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (336 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.
Abstract | Enhanced Abstract | PDF (303 KB)
Online publication date: 1-May-2010.
Abstract | Enhanced Abstract | PDF (179 KB)
Previous Article
